ChristianForums Uncensored

The only solution to the collapse of the West is the authority and power that belongs to Christ alone:

“All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen. (Matt. 28: 18-20)

Look at these 'patriots' burning the American flag - let that sink in. This is a so-called protest near capital hill regarding Gaza. The West is dealing with a radical insurgency of Islamism in coalition with the Marxist left. They hate America & all remnants of Christendom.

Here are a few things I find problematic with this video from Chandler:
1. He argues from a presupposition of "privilege" but doesn't define it.
2. Though he doesn't define "privilege," he nevertheless implies it is sinful by attaching it to the gospel.
3. He infers that "white privilege" is equitable, that is, that all white people are "privileged" simply by virtue of being white (hence why I use the term equitable).
4. Privilege isn't "invisible." If it were, it would be impossible for Chandler to compare or contrast his privileged "upbringing" with others who do not share his experience.
5. He implies that something is inherently wrong if "a lot of other brothers and sisters don't have, don't possess" the same type of privilege as others (as if sameness of experience is what should be "normative" in society).
6. He uses the term "white privilege" as if to suggest that "privilege" (though he doesn't define it) is unique or exclusive only to white people.
7. He places the onus on others to "let the gospel purify your heart" and "lean on the gospel to shape your understandings" as opposed to offering, by example, to relinquish or abdicated his "current (privileged) reality."
8. He says, "Nothing makes Anglos more angry than white privilege," as if to imply, again, that only "Anglos" are privileged and because of that exclusivity, only "Anglos" are upset by white privilege.
9. Without presenting any objective evidence or proof, he accuses others of "judging harshly" those who "can't quite get to where you are," as if the goal of society and of the gospel is to ensure equality of outcome for everyone.
10. The hands, bro. Just stop it with the hands, ok?

No...He leans toward the Theonomic side of things.

In His book Mission Of God He attempts to look back and sort through what churches have done in trying to understand the law and the Christian.

He knows some of the previous attempts at any kind of theonomy where not thought through well enough, but rather awkwardly thrust forth.

So...he looks to see how we can obey what is indeed written.

I will look to supply some quotes from a few of his books, as time permits.

There are things I agree with in regards to theonomy and things I am not sure about. I agree that **** should be punishable by death. I have no issues with that at all. But what about adultery? Are adulterers executed under the theonomy schema? If so, then one lusts after another in their heart and they make it known, would they not be executed as well?

In Britain too, alas.