News:

Create A Forum Installed

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
General Discussion / Re: Doc Sandlin on X
« Last post by Iconoclast on September 21, 2024, 12:21:58 pm »
The church meets on Sunday in celebration of the resurrection rather than on Friday in celebration of the crucifixion because the former is the central reality of the Gospel. The crucifixion, of course, is indispensable, but Christ definitively vanquished Satan, sin, and death only in the resurrection and, of course, this reality will be fully realized at our own final resurrection. Annually we celebrate Easter, but for the primitive church, Easter was every Sunday.
52
New Board / Re: What is the gospel?
« Last post by Martin Marprelate on September 21, 2024, 12:19:45 pm »
No one has preached the Gospel unless he has urged his listeners to repent and believe (Mark 1:15).  'And with many other words [Peter] testified and exhorted them, saying, "Be saved from this perverse generation"' (Acts 2:40; cf. also 2 Timothy 4:1-2).
A mere recital of facts may serve at a lecture in a theological seminary where everyone is presumed to be saved, but it is not the Gospel.
53
General Discussion / Re: Joe Boot on x
« Last post by Iconoclast on September 19, 2024, 10:26:26 am »

Voting to the Glory of God
Sep 2024
Concise
9.17.2024
Studying our Times for Faithful Action: A Call to Stand Against the World
By
Joe Boot
Editor’s Note: September marks Christ Over All‘s birthday month–we’re two years old! If you’ve been helped by our ministry, would you consider celebrating with us by giving the equivalent of a cupcake ($5), sundae ($10), birthday cake ($25) or beyond to help fund our efforts to show Christ as Lord, and everything under his feet? We would be grateful!

The man who is content to sit ignorantly by his own fireside, wrapped up in his own private affairs, and has no public eye for what is going on in the Church and the world, is a miserable patriot, and a poor style of Christian. Next to our Bibles and our own hearts, our Lord would have us study our own times. – J. C Ryle

Idolatry, Folly, and the Natural Mind
The ignorant firesides of privatized Christians are a sad reality that no era of the church has been entirely without. Truly Christian action in the world requires Christians to think carefully about culture, yet this sort of thinking is relatively sparse today. Today’s Western church is generally either paralyzed by a pietistic retreatism and cultural disengagement or misled by unthinking enthusiasts. The latter—”influencers,” agitators, and activists—are loud and sweeping in opinion, and, as the alleged victims of past generations, they are ready to act as judge, jury, and executioner. Like revolutionaries with metaphorical guillotines, they go about trying to liberate the triangle of its three sides. Invariably making haste to dispense with careful thought and get on with ‘changing the world,’ they head off to get a selfie conquering Mount Everest without knowing where it is on the map. They are ready to sternly excoriate the pastor for his privilege, alleged phobias, and participation in the patriarchy before listening to his sermons or being able to find Zephaniah between the binding, never mind quote from the minor mouthpiece of divine revelation.

Consequently, it is not an easy task to persuade believers to adopt a particular sort of careful thinking, a studying of the times in service to Christ. It is harder still to showcase and woo people to the kind of Christian thought which is unconcerned with emulating the self-justifying ideologies so popular in our woke culture. And yet, this is the very Christian thought that is radically transformational—it cuts so rightly to the root of the human selfhood and by extension moves out like ripples on a lake to touch all of life with the blessing of God.

The self-justifying ideology that dominates society today, marked by shameless moral posturing, is particularly challenging because it is a form of stupidity less self-aware than outright evil, and this particular form respects no one. It seems immune to reasoning and inconvenient truth. Intellectuals, scholars, political elites, and journalists are often more afflicted with this brand of stupidity than ordinary working people who are practically forced to consume their vacuous messages in various media. This stupidity arises not from a lack of intellectual capacity but from a herd mentality formed around powerful propaganda—a collective stupidity. It is the abstraction Kierkegaard railed against as public opinion:

The public is a kind of colossal something, an abstract void and vacuum that is all and nothing . . . the most dangerous of all powers and the most meaningless . . . Now everyone can have an opinion, but there must be a lumping together numerically in order to have it. Twenty-five signatures to the silliest notion is an opinion.[1]

1. Søren Kierkegaard, Two Ages—The Age of Revolution and the Present Age: A Literary Review, paperback, vol. 14 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009), 93, 106.
The collective folly that emerges is a sociological phenomenon that undermines basic human capabilities, depriving people of their inner independence—their ability to think, assess, and decide for themselves as God’s image-bearers. In this context, people willingly renounce their independence to conform to prevailing ideologies. In the early 1940s, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, while imprisoned, reflected on how educated Germans fell into collective ideological stupidity. His observations are startlingly reflective of our current cultural moment:

The fact that stupid people are often stubborn should not hide the fact that they are not independent. When talking to him, one feels that one is not dealing with him personally, but with catchphrases, slogans, etc. that have taken possession of him. He is under a spell; he is blinded; he is abused in his own being. Having become an instrument without an independent will, the fool will also be capable of all evil, and at the same time, unable to recognize it as evil . . . But it is also quite clear here that it is not an act of instruction, but only an act of liberation that can overcome stupidity  . . . The Bible states that the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. Thus, the inner liberation of man begins by living responsibly before God. Only then may stupidity be overcome.[2]

2. Dietrich Bonhoeffer, “Von der Dummheit”: Widerstand und Ergebung. Briefe und Aufzeichnungen aus der Haft, (Muenchen: Christian Kaiser Verlag, 1951), 17–20.
Transforming the Mind
The need of the hour in the West is the liberating reality of Jesus Christ and the recovery of the Christian mind—the mind of Christ (1 Cor. 2:16)—that leads to distinctly Christian activity. Merely political and sociological arguments will not suffice because collective folly is an abstraction, a slogan which one cannot simply reason people out of. Liberation must come from the outside, which involves the recovery of an inner independence in confrontation with the truth.

So, what is the Christian mind? And where do we begin in the study of our time? From the standpoint of scriptural revelation, truly Christian thinking must be concerned first and foremost with Jesus Christ, being His disciple, and having His Word dwell and abide in us by His Spirit. But submitting oneself as a humble follower does not come easily to anyone. Humanity is always inclined toward autonomy, preferring to live the illusion that we can legislate for ourselves, like kings without a country. Being a professing Christian does not entirely remove the inclination to strike out alone and follow our own desires. We’re still tempted to live by our own priorities and to set aside the awesome and all-consuming call to be a disciple of Christ; to come and die in order to truly live. Yet this is precisely what Christ calls us to. Being a ‘living sacrifice’ (Rom. 12:1) sounds excruciating and involves a transformation of the mind, which implies the pain and suffering of rejection by a world conformed, in the final analysis, to a very different spirit. But the divine midwife insists this is the only way. We must be reborn, transformed and given a new heart, a new mind.

As Christians, we may claim to follow Christ, but developing a truly Christian mindset for relating to and studying our times involves regularly questioning if we have followed Him far enough. It is easy to follow Christ only as far as is convenient. If we are unwilling to stand under Christ’s Lordship in all areas of life, we miss the significance of God’s full act in history.

The entire work of Christ in all His offices must become contemporaneous with us to truly transform our minds. It is insufficient to appreciate Christ’s service at the Last Supper if we refuse to see Him exalted in heavenly places, standing at God’s right hand. We must certainly see Him as priest on the road to Calvary, but also recognize Him as the resurrected Lord on the road to Emmaus to truly follow Christ and renew our minds.

A Worldly Christianity?
In a hostile context, the temptation is to follow Christ only as far as culture permits. When storms rise, we are called to step out of the boat and walk on the Word despite the world’s antagonism. We must remain attentive to God’s Word over the clamor of idolatry, for if an ungodly culture determines how far we follow Christ, we cannot follow Him at all. The world might permit us to stand near the cross of one who in their eyes was a ‘martyr,’ but they will not permit us to ascend to the seat of total authority with the ruler of kings and thereby claim his lordship over all.

The consequence of heeding only what culture permits is first an unwillingness, then an inability, to speak the whole counsel of God. As priest and prophet, Christ was hated. He warned that His followers would face the same, so we cannot follow our prophet or share in His sufferings if we refuse to prophesy his words. Many contemporary “priests” prefer Balaam’s error to preserve their living rather than stand with Elijah against Baal. Modern church leaders frequently court culture, ingratiating themselves with the powerful and influential. They deceive themselves that their goal is peaceful unity when it is actually revolt. They are avidly committed to half-measures, presenting only partial truths. As John Owen once wrote, “Truth may be lost by weakness as well as by wickedness: if we have not a full apprehension of the truth, and that upon its own proper grounds and principles, we shall never be able to defend it.”[3]

3. “The Duty of a Pastor,” in Sermons to the Church, The Works of John Owen 9, ed. William H. Goold (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1991), 453.
Can’t We All Just Get Along?
The moment God’s people call a truce with the spirit of the world, they set aside the Christian mind and overturn true Christianity. The kingdom of God is in this world but not of it; its power and authority come from a transcendent source. In history, the church is always militant, not yet fully triumphant. The struggle continues until the King comes. We are called to victory, but not peaceful collaboration. The loyalty of Christ’s soldiers is proven where the battle is fiercest, so deserting the frontline whilst denying cowardice is self-deception.

When God’s people say ‘peace, peace,’ when there is no peace, and when they sign a treaty with a rebel world, they pretend to be the heavenly church triumphant, as if their struggle against lawlessness and spiritual darkness is complete—but before the consummation of Christ. Declaring an armistice with sin or striking a deal with the godless state is not a victory, nor is it faithfulness to God’s kingdom. When the church proudly acquiesces to blessing homosexual relationships, winks at divorce and abortion, or meekly surrenders Christ’s authority over public worship, assembly, and sacraments to the state, like many Christian leaders during the Covid-19 debacle, defeats are being dressed up like conquests. It is a tragic irony that those who come into direct conflict with the world by rightly preaching righteousness and hope for history through following Christ to the uttermost are charged with ‘triumphalism,’ whilst popular collaborators who claim neutrality with the world and make a compact of surrender or privatization to the applause of culture are thought pious and realistic. In reality, they are the triumphalists—seeking to bring a false eschaton by denaturing the faith, abstracting it from the affairs of daily life, and coating what remains in honey to avoid any bitter taste in society’s mouth—for a church no longer at war is a church triumphant—or at least one that is falsely acting this way.

Conclusion
This compromised situation is one Christians should be ashamed of, as today’s unthinking Christianity, harmonized with the world, humiliates itself. Like an old man decked out in the fashions of youth, it becomes an object of ridicule. Accommodating the Christian mind to society’s whims reduces the priceless bread of life to play dough, molded to superficial preferences. Worse, those willing to sit quietly by in pious self-satisfaction amidst a failing church and culture, refusing to either understand or respond with faith and courage to the times in which they live. These are traitors to the cause of the king. Our age requires men of Issachar, not cowards who bring counsels of despair and then head home because they saw giants in Jericho.

What kind of Christian will you be?


54
New Board / Re: The General Call
« Last post by Martin Marprelate on September 17, 2024, 09:54:05 am »
Further to my last post, the Articles of the Synod of Dort (1619) say:

As many as are called by the gospel are unfeignedly calle;  for God hath most earnestly and truly declared in His word what will be acceptable to Him, namely, that all who are called should comply with the invitation.  He, moreover, seriously promises eternal life and rest to as many as shall come to Him and believe on Him.  It is not the fault of the gospel, nor of Christ offered therein, nor of God who calls men by the gospel, and confers upon them various gifgts, that those who are called by the ministry of the Word refuse to come and be converted.  The fault lies in themselves.
[Taken from Philip Schaff, A History of the Creeds of Christendom, vol.1, 1878]
55
General Discussion / Re: Joe Boot on x
« Last post by Iconoclast on September 13, 2024, 11:21:22 am »
I won't apologise for the claims of the LORD Jesus Christ!
I won't apologise for the teaching of Scripture
I won't apologise for the Law of God
I won't apologise for being a Christian
I won't apologise for being a white, male, middle class, heterosexual married man with children.
I won't apologise for defending real marriage between a man and a woman
I won't apologise for defending the unborn
I won't apologise for defending the vulnerable, sick and elderly
I won't apologise for opposing sexual immorality
I won't apologise for debunking & opposing the LGBTQ idolatry
I won't apologise for opposing feminism and all forms for Critical Theory
I won't apologise for asserting that elders in the church should be men
I won't apologise for defending women from the destruction of gender norms and distinctions.
I won't apologise for being British
I won't apologise for being a patriot or for the Union Jack
I won't apologise for promoting conservative constitutionalism and the nation-state.
I won't apologise for the blessings of the British Empire
I won't apologise for global mission
I won't apologise for opposing socialism, cultural Marxism and statism
I won't apologise for opposing Islamism & the myths of multiculturalism
I won't apologise for calling an apostate church to repent
I won't apologise for opposing ethno-nationalist parodies of Christianity
I won't apologise for opposing ethnic prejudice or fascistic attitudes
I won't apologise for the kingdom of God - from every tribe, tongue, people and nation!

... and much more. But that will do for now!
56
General Discussion / Re: James White on X
« Last post by Iconoclast on September 10, 2024, 10:20:55 pm »
While you all are beating your heads on the wall with the Presidential debate, a package arrived this afternoon at my home. It contains the new book by the father and son team of Richard and Christopher Hays. The book is titled The Widening of God's Mercy: Sexuality Within the Biblical Story (Yale University Press, 2024).

I have looked into the book and I can tell you, right at the start: this is a simple waste of paper. It truly is. Shallow is not the proper term. There are no references to Robert Gagnon (let alone Michael Brown or myself, fully expected). There is no interaction with any of the scholarship and argumentation that has been produced. Instead, this is a long, arduous attempt to create a narrative, well, to continue a narrative common in ultra progressivist writers, that I first heard enunciated by Dr. Kirk in his debate with Gagnon in Scottsdale, Arizona. It is a mechanism to utterly overthrow any moral or ethical content in Scripture. Hence, they do not even try to argue the key texts. Instead, here is the singular reference to such a key text as 1 Cor 6:9-11:

When the people of God change their minds about things, it is often because someone offers a new vision of God's will. Any time we revise our plans, we literally re-envision things. That is what we have sought to do in this book: to re-envision and reframe the debate about sexuality in the church.

We believe that this debate should no longer focus on the endlessly repeated exegetical arguments about half a dozen isolated texts that forbid or disapprove of same-sex relations. (The regularly cited texts are Gen 19:1-9, Lev 18:22, 20:13, 1 Cor 6:9-11, 1 Tim 1:10, and Rom 1:18-32.) In this book, we have not revisited them. It is relatively clear that these texts view homosexual sex negatively, even if they do not envisage covenanted same-sex partnerships as we know them today.? But drawing conclusions based only on these passages would be like basing a biblical theology of slavery on Exod 21:2 (which assumes one can buy a slave) and 1 Pet 2:18 (which tells slaves to be subject to their masters), or a theology of immigration on Ezek 44:9's exclusion of foreigners from the sanctuary.

Instead, we hope to refocus the conversation on larger narrative patterns and precedents in the Bible. The stories we've summarized in the foregoing chapters disclose a deeper logic, a narrative pattern in which God's grace and mercy regularly overflow the prohibitions and restrictions that exclude and condemn fixed classes of human beingseven when those prohibitions were explicitly attributed to God in earlier biblical texts. We believe that our contemporary debates about sexuality should be shaped by that deeper logic. It may be difficult to get our minds around this idea, but if we take the biblical narratives seriously, we can't avoid the conclusion that God regularly changes his mind, even when it means overriding previous judgments. (206-207)

So, what the actual text of Scripture says is now, to the Hays, irrelevant. This is the exact same thinking we have in the Constitution as a “living document” and all the rest of the modern jib-jab that cannot deal with what the text says, so let’s just ignore it and create a “meta-narrative” that fits our goals.

The real irony is that the older Hays actually hides away in a footnote the assertion that he was right in what he wrote years ago! Here’s the note:

2. The biblical authors did not have in mind the sort of homosexual relationships that the church now considers blessing, and it is not possible to imagine what they might have said about them. As it is, many of the passages are unambiguous in their disapproval of homosexual activity. See Richard B. Hays, The Moral Vision of the New Testament: Community, Cross, New Creation (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1996), 381-89. 1 (Richard) stand fully behind the descriptive exegetical judgments I made there about the meaning of all these texts. But I also draw the reader's attention to the final sentences of my discussion of Rom 1:18-32: “[N]o one should presume to be above God's judgment; all of us stand in radical need of God's mercy. Thus, Paul's warning should transform the terms of our contemporary debate about homosexuality: no one has a secure platform to stand upon in order to pronounce condemnation on others. Anyone who presumes to have such a vantage point is living in a dangerous fantasy, oblivious to the gospel that levels all of us before a holy God." I now wish that I had added another clause to that final sentence, so that it would read, "the gospel that levels all of us before a holy God who welcomes all of us with infinite compassion and mercy."

We will, of course, talk about this on the Dividing Line. But for now, while everyone else is rather preoccupied with other things, I wanted to post something quickly as this kind of rhetoric has a way of being passed around as the “latest scholarly conclusions” when in fact it is a simple abandonment of the Scriptural field of battle.
57
General Discussion / Re: Joe Boot on x
« Last post by Iconoclast on September 10, 2024, 08:25:55 am »
In a time of economic, social, cultural and spiritual decline, it is all to easy to look for groups to blame for it all - Communists/Marxists, ethnic minorities, Jews, Muslims and so forth, rather than face the reality of the apostasy, rebellion and corruption of the church and sins of our society now facing the judgment of God. Judgment begins at the house of God & he does not tolerate blame-shifting. Panic, paranoia, and conspiratorial thinking about everything has always been a mark of collapsing cultures including Ancient Rome and Nazi Germany. Christians must rise above this and recognise that Jesus Christ is Lord and at the wheel of history. He rules and judges the nations from His seat of total authority. Read Psalm 2 today and place your faith and trust in the Messiah King and focus on seeking first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness. Leave it to God to oversee history - His verdict is always infallible!
58
General Discussion / Re: James White on X
« Last post by Iconoclast on September 06, 2024, 09:28:52 am »
So, I am sure the more stable of you have noticed something.

You start perusing your feeds, looking for news, maybe even a few sports items (remember those days?), and you run into the Grand Controversy of the Day.  The New Big Movement.  The "If you aren't down with this, you are probably an old boomer who is to blame for everything going wrong today" thing.  And all of a sudden everyone, including folks who had never even typed the words that make up the name of this new hot item in their lives before, are experts.  So you've got all sorts of experts on how and why their fathers and grandfathers betrayed them and sold their birthrights and were stupid neanderthals because they didn't have social media and forty seven subscription services where they can watch 500 different mind-emptying programs simultaneously ("they only had three TV channels!"). And you have to respond to every and all challenges on this new, vital, world-changing thing now, and if you don't, clearly you are a coward and wrong about everything and always have been.

But, then, a week later, or maybe a month later...everything changes.  It's a new vital and important and world-changing thing that may, or may not, be connected to the last one.  I mean, I guess you can make some kind of connection between Jews being behind every evil thing that happens in the world and the Crusades and Churchill, if you try hard enough, but it's pretty exhausting to keep doing that kind of thing.  And boom, everyone is back to being an expert and now you have to read three dozen other books or you just can't comment and why don't you old people get with it and you are so mean and discouraging to all of us who are young and with it and BOOM the next week it is the next new movement and the last one isn't all that important anymore.

Yes, it's exhausting, but I would like to suggest it is purposeful.  Christians are to have the mind of Christ.  Christians are to think God's thoughts after Him.  Christians are to meditate (and meditation and doing things at high speed don't go well together). We are to be disciplined in our thinking, thorough in our analysis, careful, and yes, patient.  We are to cultivate a heart of wisdom before God, one that is grown and nurtured in light of God's revelation in Scripture, and in the light of eternity itself.  So this scatter-gun, rapid-fire, vapid, shallow, emotionally driven circus we are seeing right now is meant to discourage the very patterns of life and thought Christians are called to.  This isn't a "psyop," it is the Enemy of our souls.  It is spiritual.
10:29 PM · Sep 4, 2024

·
69.6K
 Views
60
General Discussion / Re: Joe Boot on x
« Last post by Iconoclast on September 04, 2024, 10:26:34 am »
Dualistic Two Kingdoms Theology in every form (Lutheran, Anabaptist, Escondido 'reformed' 2k, Ethno-Nationalist 'retrieval,' Medieval 'retrieval') all share a common belief that the thought-forms of Aristotle & the synthesis rationalist theology of scholasticism are the need of the hour. Somehow the king of Sodom is still supposed to make Abraham rich. Like a sailor shipwrecked by a faulty keel deciding to salvage it from the ocean floor to build another vessel returns to the cause of his own destruction, many today seek to recover that which has aided our cultural ruin.


Jesus is Lord over all of life. Sphere Sovereignty is the organising principle of the only totalizing concept scripture allows - the Kingdom of God.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10