21
New Board / Re: People Who Have been Wrongly Instructed On Calvinism
« Last post by Iconoclast on December 14, 2024, 11:57:16 am »The true doctrine (concerning perseverance) having been explained, the Synod rejects the errors of those who
teach:
Rejection 1
That the perseverance of the true believers is not a fruit of election or a gift of God gained by the death of Christ, but a condition of the
new covenant, which (as they declare) man before his decisive election and justification must fulfill through his free will.
For the Holy Scripture testifies that this follows out of election, and is given the elect in virtue of the death, the
resurrection and intercession of Christ: “but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded” (Rom. 11:7).
Likewise: “He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely
give us all things? Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that
condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also
maketh intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?” (Rom. 8:32–35).
Rejection 2
That God does indeed provide the believer with sufficient powers to persevere and is ever ready to preserve these in him, if he will do his
duty; but that though all things which are necessary to persevere in faith and which God will use to preserve faith are made use of, it even
then ever depends on the pleasure of the will whether it will persevere or not.
For this idea contains an outspoken Pelagianism, and while it would make men free, it makes them robbers of
God's honor, contrary to the prevailing agreement of the evangelical doctrine, which takes from man all cause of
boasting and ascribes all the praise for this favor to the grace of God alone; and contrary to the apostle, who
declares that it is God “Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord
Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 1:
.
Rejection 3
That the true believers and regenerate not only can fall from justifying faith and likewise from grace and salvation wholly and to the end,
but indeed often do fall from this and are lost forever.
For this conception makes powerless the grace, justification, regeneration, and continued keeping by Christ,
contrary to the expressed words of the apostle Paul: “That, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much
more then, being now justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him” (Rom. 5:8, 9). And
contrary to the apostle John: “Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and
he cannot sin, because he is born of God” (1 John 3:9). And also contrary to the words of Jesus Christ: “I give unto
them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of My hand. My Father, which
gave them Me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of My Father's hand” (John 10:28, 29).
Rejection 4
That true believers and regenerate can sin the sin unto death or against the Holy Spirit.
Since the same apostle John, after having spoken in the fifth chapter of his first epistle, verses 16 and 17, of
those who sin unto death and having forbidden to pray for them, immediately adds to this in verse 18: “We know
that whosoever is born of God sinneth not (meaning a sin of that character); but he that is begotten of God keepeth
himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not” (1 John 5:18).
Rejection 5
That without a special revelation we can have no certainty of future perseverance in this life.
For by this doctrine the sure comfort of the true believers is taken away in this life and the doubts of the papist
are again introduced into the church, while the Holy Scriptures constantly deduce this assurance, not from a special
and extraordinary revelation, but from the marks proper to the children of God and from the constant promises of
God. So especially the apostle Paul: “Nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God,
which is in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Rom. 8:39). And John declares: “And he that keepeth His commandments
dwelleth in Him, and He in him. And hereby we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us”
(1 John 3:24).
Rejection 6
That the doctrine of the certainty of perseverance and of salvation from its own character and nature is a cause of indolence and is
injurious to godliness, good morals, prayers and other holy exercises, but that on the contrary it is praiseworthy to doubt.
For these show that they do not know the power of divine grace and the working of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
And they contradict the apostle John, who teaches the opposite with express words in his first epistle: “Beloved,
now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when He shall appear,
we shall be like Him; for we shall see Him as He is. And every man that hath this hope in Him purifieth himself,
even as He is pure” (1 John 3:2–3). Furthermore, these are contradicted by the example of the saints, both of the
Old and the New Testament, who though they were assured of their perseverance and salvation, were nevertheless
constant in prayers and other exercises of godliness.
Rejection 7
That the faith of those who believe for a time does not differ from justifying and saving faith except only in duration.
For Christ Himself, in Matthew 13:20, Luke 8:13, and in other places, evidently notes, besides this duration, a
threefold difference between those who believe only for a time and true believers, when He declares that the former
receive the seed in stony ground, but the latter in the good ground or heart; that the former are without root, but
the latter have a firm root; that the former are without fruit, but that the latter bring forth their fruit in various
measure with constancy and steadfastness.
Rejection 8
That it is not absurd that one having lost his first regeneration, is again and even often born anew.
For these deny by this doctrine the incorruptibleness of the seed of God, whereby we are born again, contrary to
the testimony of the apostle Peter: “Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible” (1 Peter 1:23).
Rejection 9
That Christ has in no place prayed that believers should infallibly continue in faith.
For they contradict Christ Himself, who says: “I have prayed for thee (Simon), that thy faith fail not” (Luke
22:32); and the evangelist John, who declares that Christ has not prayed for the apostles only, but also for those
who through their word would believe: “Holy Father, keep through Thine own name those whom Thou hast given
Me,” and: “I pray not that Thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldest keep them from the
evil”; “Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on Me through their word” (John 17:11,
15, 20).
Conclusion
And this is the perspicuous, simple, and ingenuous declaration of the orthodox doctrine respecting the five articles
which have been controverted in the Belgic churches, and the rejection of the errors with which they have for some
time been troubled. This doctrine the Synod judges to be drawn from the Word of God and to be agreeable to the
confessions of the Reformed churches. Whence it clearly appears that some whom such conduct by no means
became, have violated all truth, equity, and charity, in wishing to persuade the public:
“That the doctrine of the Reformed churches concerning predestination, and the points annexed to it, by its own genius and necessary
tendency, leads off the minds of men from all piety and religion; that it is an opiate administered by the flesh and the devil, and the
stronghold of Satan, where he lies in wait for all; and from which he wounds multitudes, and mortally strikes through many with the
darts both of despair and security; that it makes God the author of sin, unjust, tyrannical, hypocritical; that it is nothing more than
interpolated Stoicism, Manicheism, Libertinism, Turcism; that it renders men carnally secure, since they are persuaded by it that nothing
can hinder the salvation of the elect, let them live as they please; and therefore, that they may safely perpetrate every species of the most
atrocious crimes; and that if the reprobate should even perform truly all the works of the saints, their obedience would not in the least
contribute to their salvation; that the same doctrine teaches that God, by a mere arbitrary act of His will, without the least respect or view
to any sin, has predestinated the greatest part of the world to eternal damnation; and has created them for this very purpose; that in the
same manner in which the election is the fountain and the cause of faith and good works, reprobation is the cause of unbelief and impiety;
that many children of the faithful are torn guiltless from their mothers' breasts and tyrannically plunged into hell; so that neither baptism
nor the prayers of the Church at their baptism, can at all profit by them”; and many other things of the same kind which the
Reformed Churches not only do not acknowledge, but even detest with their whole soul. Wherefore, this Synod of
Dort, in the name of the Lord, conjures as many as piously call upon the name of our Savior Jesus Christ, to judge
of the faith of the Reformed Churches not from the calumnies, which on every side are heaped upon it; nor from
the private expressions of a few among ancient and modern teachers, often dishonestly quoted or corrupted and
wrested to a meaning quite foreign to their intention; but from the public confessions of the Churches themselves
and from the declaration of the orthodox doctrine, confirmed by the unanimous consent of all and each of the
members of the whole Synod. Moreover, the Synod warns calumniators themselves to consider the terrible
judgment of God which awaits them for bearing false witness against the confessions of so many churches, for
distressing the consciences of the weak, and for laboring to render suspect the society of the truly faithful. Finally,
this Synod exhorts all their brethren in the gospel of Christ to conduct themselves piously and religiously in
handling this doctrine, both in the universities and churches; to direct it, as well in discourse as in writing, to the
glory of the divine Name, to holiness of life, and to the consolation of afflicted souls; to regulate, by the Scripture,
according to the analogy of faith, not only their sentiments, but also their language; and to abstain from all those
phrases which exceed the limits necessary to be observed in ascertaining the genuine sense of the holy Scriptures,
and may furnish insolent sophists with a just pretext for violently assailing or even vilifying the doctrine of the
Reformed churches.
May Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who, seated at the Father's right hand, gives gifts to men, sanctify us in the
truth, bring to the truth those who err, shut the mouths of the calumniators of sound doctrine, and endue the
faithful minister of His Word with the spirit of wisdom and discretion, that all their discourses may tend to the glory
of God and the edification of those who hear them. Amen.
That this is our faith and decision we certify by subscribing our names.
Here follow the names, not only of President, Assistant President, and Secretaries of the Synod, and of the
Professors of Theology in the Dutch Churches, but of all the Members who were deputed to the Synod as the
Representatives of their respective Churches, that is, of the Delegates from Great Britain, the Electoral Palatinate,
Hessia, Switzerland, Wetteraw, The Republic and Church of Geneva, The Republic and Church of Bremen, The
Republic and Church of Emden, The Duchy of Gelderland and of Zutphen, South Holland, North Holland,
Zeeland, The Province of Utrecht, Friesland, Transylvania, The State of Groningen and Omland, Drent, The
French Churches.
teach:
Rejection 1
That the perseverance of the true believers is not a fruit of election or a gift of God gained by the death of Christ, but a condition of the
new covenant, which (as they declare) man before his decisive election and justification must fulfill through his free will.
For the Holy Scripture testifies that this follows out of election, and is given the elect in virtue of the death, the
resurrection and intercession of Christ: “but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded” (Rom. 11:7).
Likewise: “He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely
give us all things? Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that
condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also
maketh intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?” (Rom. 8:32–35).
Rejection 2
That God does indeed provide the believer with sufficient powers to persevere and is ever ready to preserve these in him, if he will do his
duty; but that though all things which are necessary to persevere in faith and which God will use to preserve faith are made use of, it even
then ever depends on the pleasure of the will whether it will persevere or not.
For this idea contains an outspoken Pelagianism, and while it would make men free, it makes them robbers of
God's honor, contrary to the prevailing agreement of the evangelical doctrine, which takes from man all cause of
boasting and ascribes all the praise for this favor to the grace of God alone; and contrary to the apostle, who
declares that it is God “Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord
Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 1:
.Rejection 3
That the true believers and regenerate not only can fall from justifying faith and likewise from grace and salvation wholly and to the end,
but indeed often do fall from this and are lost forever.
For this conception makes powerless the grace, justification, regeneration, and continued keeping by Christ,
contrary to the expressed words of the apostle Paul: “That, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much
more then, being now justified by His blood, we shall be saved from wrath through Him” (Rom. 5:8, 9). And
contrary to the apostle John: “Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and
he cannot sin, because he is born of God” (1 John 3:9). And also contrary to the words of Jesus Christ: “I give unto
them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of My hand. My Father, which
gave them Me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of My Father's hand” (John 10:28, 29).
Rejection 4
That true believers and regenerate can sin the sin unto death or against the Holy Spirit.
Since the same apostle John, after having spoken in the fifth chapter of his first epistle, verses 16 and 17, of
those who sin unto death and having forbidden to pray for them, immediately adds to this in verse 18: “We know
that whosoever is born of God sinneth not (meaning a sin of that character); but he that is begotten of God keepeth
himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not” (1 John 5:18).
Rejection 5
That without a special revelation we can have no certainty of future perseverance in this life.
For by this doctrine the sure comfort of the true believers is taken away in this life and the doubts of the papist
are again introduced into the church, while the Holy Scriptures constantly deduce this assurance, not from a special
and extraordinary revelation, but from the marks proper to the children of God and from the constant promises of
God. So especially the apostle Paul: “Nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God,
which is in Christ Jesus our Lord” (Rom. 8:39). And John declares: “And he that keepeth His commandments
dwelleth in Him, and He in him. And hereby we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us”
(1 John 3:24).
Rejection 6
That the doctrine of the certainty of perseverance and of salvation from its own character and nature is a cause of indolence and is
injurious to godliness, good morals, prayers and other holy exercises, but that on the contrary it is praiseworthy to doubt.
For these show that they do not know the power of divine grace and the working of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
And they contradict the apostle John, who teaches the opposite with express words in his first epistle: “Beloved,
now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when He shall appear,
we shall be like Him; for we shall see Him as He is. And every man that hath this hope in Him purifieth himself,
even as He is pure” (1 John 3:2–3). Furthermore, these are contradicted by the example of the saints, both of the
Old and the New Testament, who though they were assured of their perseverance and salvation, were nevertheless
constant in prayers and other exercises of godliness.
Rejection 7
That the faith of those who believe for a time does not differ from justifying and saving faith except only in duration.
For Christ Himself, in Matthew 13:20, Luke 8:13, and in other places, evidently notes, besides this duration, a
threefold difference between those who believe only for a time and true believers, when He declares that the former
receive the seed in stony ground, but the latter in the good ground or heart; that the former are without root, but
the latter have a firm root; that the former are without fruit, but that the latter bring forth their fruit in various
measure with constancy and steadfastness.
Rejection 8
That it is not absurd that one having lost his first regeneration, is again and even often born anew.
For these deny by this doctrine the incorruptibleness of the seed of God, whereby we are born again, contrary to
the testimony of the apostle Peter: “Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible” (1 Peter 1:23).
Rejection 9
That Christ has in no place prayed that believers should infallibly continue in faith.
For they contradict Christ Himself, who says: “I have prayed for thee (Simon), that thy faith fail not” (Luke
22:32); and the evangelist John, who declares that Christ has not prayed for the apostles only, but also for those
who through their word would believe: “Holy Father, keep through Thine own name those whom Thou hast given
Me,” and: “I pray not that Thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldest keep them from the
evil”; “Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on Me through their word” (John 17:11,
15, 20).
Conclusion
And this is the perspicuous, simple, and ingenuous declaration of the orthodox doctrine respecting the five articles
which have been controverted in the Belgic churches, and the rejection of the errors with which they have for some
time been troubled. This doctrine the Synod judges to be drawn from the Word of God and to be agreeable to the
confessions of the Reformed churches. Whence it clearly appears that some whom such conduct by no means
became, have violated all truth, equity, and charity, in wishing to persuade the public:
“That the doctrine of the Reformed churches concerning predestination, and the points annexed to it, by its own genius and necessary
tendency, leads off the minds of men from all piety and religion; that it is an opiate administered by the flesh and the devil, and the
stronghold of Satan, where he lies in wait for all; and from which he wounds multitudes, and mortally strikes through many with the
darts both of despair and security; that it makes God the author of sin, unjust, tyrannical, hypocritical; that it is nothing more than
interpolated Stoicism, Manicheism, Libertinism, Turcism; that it renders men carnally secure, since they are persuaded by it that nothing
can hinder the salvation of the elect, let them live as they please; and therefore, that they may safely perpetrate every species of the most
atrocious crimes; and that if the reprobate should even perform truly all the works of the saints, their obedience would not in the least
contribute to their salvation; that the same doctrine teaches that God, by a mere arbitrary act of His will, without the least respect or view
to any sin, has predestinated the greatest part of the world to eternal damnation; and has created them for this very purpose; that in the
same manner in which the election is the fountain and the cause of faith and good works, reprobation is the cause of unbelief and impiety;
that many children of the faithful are torn guiltless from their mothers' breasts and tyrannically plunged into hell; so that neither baptism
nor the prayers of the Church at their baptism, can at all profit by them”; and many other things of the same kind which the
Reformed Churches not only do not acknowledge, but even detest with their whole soul. Wherefore, this Synod of
Dort, in the name of the Lord, conjures as many as piously call upon the name of our Savior Jesus Christ, to judge
of the faith of the Reformed Churches not from the calumnies, which on every side are heaped upon it; nor from
the private expressions of a few among ancient and modern teachers, often dishonestly quoted or corrupted and
wrested to a meaning quite foreign to their intention; but from the public confessions of the Churches themselves
and from the declaration of the orthodox doctrine, confirmed by the unanimous consent of all and each of the
members of the whole Synod. Moreover, the Synod warns calumniators themselves to consider the terrible
judgment of God which awaits them for bearing false witness against the confessions of so many churches, for
distressing the consciences of the weak, and for laboring to render suspect the society of the truly faithful. Finally,
this Synod exhorts all their brethren in the gospel of Christ to conduct themselves piously and religiously in
handling this doctrine, both in the universities and churches; to direct it, as well in discourse as in writing, to the
glory of the divine Name, to holiness of life, and to the consolation of afflicted souls; to regulate, by the Scripture,
according to the analogy of faith, not only their sentiments, but also their language; and to abstain from all those
phrases which exceed the limits necessary to be observed in ascertaining the genuine sense of the holy Scriptures,
and may furnish insolent sophists with a just pretext for violently assailing or even vilifying the doctrine of the
Reformed churches.
May Jesus Christ, the Son of God, who, seated at the Father's right hand, gives gifts to men, sanctify us in the
truth, bring to the truth those who err, shut the mouths of the calumniators of sound doctrine, and endue the
faithful minister of His Word with the spirit of wisdom and discretion, that all their discourses may tend to the glory
of God and the edification of those who hear them. Amen.
That this is our faith and decision we certify by subscribing our names.
Here follow the names, not only of President, Assistant President, and Secretaries of the Synod, and of the
Professors of Theology in the Dutch Churches, but of all the Members who were deputed to the Synod as the
Representatives of their respective Churches, that is, of the Delegates from Great Britain, the Electoral Palatinate,
Hessia, Switzerland, Wetteraw, The Republic and Church of Geneva, The Republic and Church of Bremen, The
Republic and Church of Emden, The Duchy of Gelderland and of Zutphen, South Holland, North Holland,
Zeeland, The Province of Utrecht, Friesland, Transylvania, The State of Groningen and Omland, Drent, The
French Churches.
Recent Posts